How charities promote open borders in Britain
Yet again taxpayers' money has been used to undermine national security
Last week it was revealed that over 30,000 people have crossed the English Channel on small boats this year - an increase of 14 percent the same period in 2023.
Anyone with common sense knows that this is a completely unsustainable and dangerous situation. But there's less awareness about the systems “beneath the surface” that make it happen.
Essentially we have numerous charities/ foundations that want a “borderless Britain”, funding refugees/ migrants who come here - essentially rewarding the fact some have broken the rules - and/ or making it extremely difficult to deport them.
Worst of all, the taxpayer is being CHARGED for some of these bodies - so prepare for shocking sums ahead. Without further ado, here are examples of organisations we have given funding to, and how they’ve used it to quietly turn Britain into an open border state:
£250,000 (2024) - Barrow Cadbury Trust
Shockingly, while the Conservatives promised to “Stop the Boats”, they also handed out a quarter of a million in taxpayers’ money to the Barrow Cadbury Trust - which is committed to helping “refugees, asylum seekers and undocumented migrants; and the communities which receive them”.
The Trust funds no end of initiatives that incentivise movement to Britain’s shores (bearing in mind the billions we are spending each year on accommodating the current number of arrivals, including economic migrants). One example is “Asylum Matters”, which “works in partnership locally and nationally to improve the lives of refugees and people seeking asylum through social and political change”. More here:
£1,395,000 (2019-2023) - the Paul Hamlyn Foundation
The Paul Hamlyn Foundation is perhaps the most extreme left-wing organisation I have come across while researching charities and Woke Waste. It is completely transparent about wanting open borders, as you can see from information about its “Migration Fund” below:
HOPE not hate has received the Migration Fund three times (and had £585,000 in total from the PHF).
Some of the projects the Paul Hamlyn Foundation has funded (and these are just the tip of the iceberg) are:
African Rainbow Family
Project: No Pride in Deportation
Hackney Migrant Centre
Project: Hackney Migrant Centre Advice Service
Independent Workers Union of Great Britain
Project: “Nurturing and Developing Migrant Leaders from the Grassroots”
Migrant Action
Project: Migration and Systemic Justice
Refugee Legal Support
Project: RLS Leadership
It has also given hundreds of thousands to the Joint Council of the Welfare of Immigrants which helped block flights to Rwanda earlier this year:
£63,000 (2019-2023) - Trust for London
The Trust for London has all sorts of programmes to support “migrant Londoners” - never mind that the native population can barely afford to live in the Capital.
It provides special legal advice, for instance, making it much easier for people to stay in the UK:
A snapshot of the beautiful utopia it’s taking us towards:
£6,183,710 (2019-2023) - Nuffield Foundation
The taxpayer has been charged colossal amounts for the Nuffield Foundation, which has been working on projects including:
Immigrant Families in the Family Justice System, led by Professor Renee Luthra (University of Essex)
This project will investigate how the immigration experience influences parental separation in immigrant families. A 2023 House of Lords Justice and Home Affairs Committee inquiry highlighted how Brexit, “hostile environment” migration policies, and the tightening of the immigration system have disrupted the lives of families. The uncertainty, difficulties in maintaining relationships, and financial burden create further pressures on relationships. The researchers will work with third-sector organisations and law practitioners to co-create and disseminate outputs, including best practice briefings for legal practitioners, and to improve signposting and access to information for immigrant families.
Immigration Detention and the Rule of Law, led by Dr Jean-Pierre Gauci (British Institute of International and Comparative Law)
This project will update safeguarding principles on immigration detention, first published by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law in 2013, to ensure they reflect the latest developments and continue to function as a practical resource. Immigration detention is widely used across many countries and regions, and the privatisation and externalisation of detention are increasingly mainstream. Practices including the use of Bibby Stockholm barge and Wethersfield airfield to detain migrants have raised questions about adherence to the rule of law.
You’d forget that charities and the politicians who have funded them so generously actually have an obligation to Brits - who are increasingly treated as no more than a walking wallet to help the rest of the world move here.
It’s important to say that there are genuine refugees who need help, and I’m not calling for a state devoid of compassion. The issue is that there is now little compassion for Brits who might - shock, horror - want some security in their own country! Never mind taxpayers’ lack of awareness that their money has been poured into these organisations. It’s yet another instance of the past Conservative government “saying one thing and funding the opposite” - and unfortunately there are more examples to come.
Support my journalism with a paid subscription (plus, get additional content.)
I try to keep most of my content free - so that as many as possible can have the info. At the same time I need more paid subs/ support to do so. Please consider a paid subscription or PayPal donation to support my investigations. And thank you to everyone who has supported my work to date.
More:
